Aird Berlis Logo in white
Aird McBurney Logo
  • Home
  • People
  • What We Do
    • Practice Areas & Industries
    • Representative Matters
  • Who We Are
    • About Aird & Berlis
    • Firm Values
    • Accolades
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • International Reach
    • Commitment to Community
  • Insights
    • All Insights
    • Firm News
    • Publications
    • Videos
    • Events & Webinars
    • Subscribe
    • Doing Business in Canada
  • Join Us
    • Students
      • Summer
      • Articling
      • In Their Own Words
      • Resources
      • Contacts
  • Contact Us

Codie
Mitchell

Partner
  • cmitchell@airdberlis.com
  • 416.865.3962
Office:
  • Toronto Office
Call to Bar:
Admitted to the Ontario Bar: 2020
  • Share this page
    • LinkedIn
    • X (Twitter)
    • Facebook
    • Email
MITCHELL_Codie-20680-web
  1. Home
  2. >
  3. People
  4. >
  5. Bio
  6. >
  7. Codie Mitchell

Codie thrives on the intellectual stimulation and problem-solving-nature of litigation. He uses critical thinking and a strong understanding of the importance of language to resolve his client’s disputes.

Codie is a member of the firm’s Litigation & Dispute Resolution Group. He maintains a general litigation practice. Codie has a particular interest in contractual interpretation and administrative law, as well as constitutional law and civil liberties.

Codie joined Aird & Berlis as an associate after summering and articling with the firm.

Expertise

  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Representative Matters

Representative Matter

City of Ottawa Does Not Owe Developer Duty of Care over Contents of Easement

This is an update to our July 25, 2019 bulletin summarizing Justice Sally Gomery’s decision in Charlesfort Developments Ltd. v. Ottawa (City of), 2019 ONSC 4460. In that decision, Justice Gomery determined that the City of Ottawa was negligent in failing to advertise to Charlesfort the potential risks associated with a high pressure water main in a municipal easement running alongside the property it proposed to develop.

June 11, 2021

Representative Matter

Court of Appeal Rules on Scope of Insurance Coverage for Cyber Matters

This is an update to our May 15, 2020 bulletin summarizing Justice Pollak’s decision in Laridae v. Co-operators, 2020 ONSC 2198. In that decision, she ruled that the insurer, Co-operators, had a duty to defend Family and Children’s Services of Lanark, Leeds and Grenville (“FCS”) and Laridae Communications Inc. against two claims. Co-operators argued that it had no duty to defend based on data exclusion clauses under the respective insurance policies, which excluded claims arising from the distribution or display of data by means of an internet website.

March 15, 2021

Related Publications

Article

A Mareva Injunction Refresher: Can a Strong Prima Facie Case of Fraud Alone Support an Inference of Asset Dissipation and/or Disposal Risk?

October 09, 2019

Article

The Federal Court of Appeal Grants Leave to Six Judicial Review Applications That Seek to Quash the Reapproval of the Trans Mountain Expansion Project

September 11, 2019

Article

Protection of Rights in Canada and International Comity

July 13, 2017

Related News

Firm News

Aird & Berlis Welcomes Nine New Partners

January 27, 2026

Education

  • JD, University of Ottawa, 2019
  • MA (Philosophy), Ryerson University, 2014
  • BA, Ryerson University, 2012
Aird Berlis Logo in white
Aird McBurney Logo
  • Toronto Office

    Aird & Berlis LLP
    Brookfield Place
    181 Bay St., Suite 1800
    Toronto, ON, Canada
    M5J 2T9
  • Vancouver Office

    Aird & Berlis LLP
    701 West Georgia St., Suite 1420
    Vancouver, BC, Canada
    V7Y 1E4

  • People
  • What We Do
  • Who We Are
  • Insights
  • Join Us
  • Contact Us
  • Students
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Join us on LinkedIn
  • Follow us on YouTube

All content © Aird & Berlis LLP. All rights reserved.

Aird McBurney is a trademark of Aird & Berlis LLP.

  • Accessibility
  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Responsible Use of AI

Developed by Cubicle Fugitive